Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
  1. Jun 23, 2017
    • Cedric Roux's avatar
      bladerf: minor: add log for RX overrun · a8ae85f6
      Cedric Roux authored
      a8ae85f6
    • Cedric Roux's avatar
      bladerf: tentative to have it functional · 0da60274
      Cedric Roux authored
      Several problems are present.
      
      The first is that _write returns 0 instead of the
      number of samples. We solve it by returning
      nsamps.
      
      The second is that _read may return less samples at
      the beginning and we don't want to exit for that.
      We solve it also by returning nsamps.
      (We still need to log more in this, to be done in the
      next commit.)
      
      The third is that after initialization we don't send
      anything for a while, time for the softmodem to finish
      its init. This generates lots of "RX overrun".
      We solve it by disabling TX and RX modules after init
      and then in trx_brf_start we activate them again (and
      also call bladerf_sync_config, which seems to be
      mandatory, and bladerf_calibrate_dc, which may be avoided,
      perhaps).
      
      Maybe not the end of the story. Sometimes it works, UE connects,
      traffic is fine (tested only with 5MHz). Sometimes it does not,
      UE does not connect, or it connects but then traffic is bad,
      especially uplink.
      
      To be refined.
      0da60274
  2. May 22, 2017
  3. May 18, 2017
  4. May 15, 2017
  5. Mar 27, 2017
    • Cedric Roux's avatar
      bugfix: workaround a problem with timestamp and LMSSDR. · fa0b8668
      Cedric Roux authored
      We have a strange problem with the timestamp of the very
      first packets received from the LimeSDR that leads to
      a complete failure of the eNB.
      
      A simple workaround is to discard the first RX packet
      just after a "start" of the device.
      
      We also change the value of "tx_sample_advance" to a more
      reasonable value. The problem of timestamp was "solved"
      differently in the past and at the time we needed to put
      a much higher value.
      
      This may have to be refined at some point.
      fa0b8668
  6. Mar 24, 2017
  7. Mar 16, 2017
  8. Mar 15, 2017
  9. Mar 08, 2017
  10. Mar 03, 2017
  11. Mar 01, 2017
  12. Feb 17, 2017
  13. Feb 14, 2017
  14. Feb 13, 2017
  15. Feb 10, 2017
  16. Feb 09, 2017
  17. Feb 02, 2017
  18. Feb 01, 2017
  19. Jan 29, 2017
  20. Jan 28, 2017
  21. Jan 18, 2017
  22. Jan 15, 2017
  23. Jan 13, 2017
  24. Jan 07, 2017
  25. Jan 03, 2017
  26. Dec 26, 2016
  27. Dec 07, 2016
  28. Dec 04, 2016
  29. Dec 02, 2016
Loading