- Apr 11, 2018
-
-
Haruki NAOI authored
-
Wu Jing authored
-
- Apr 10, 2018
-
-
Wu Jing authored
Merge branch 'sp3_rlc_assertion' of http://10.37.145.15:8000/gitlab/vran/release_enb into sp3_rlc_assertion
-
Wu Jing authored
-
- Apr 09, 2018
-
-
teramoto.genki authored
Merge branch 'sp3_rlc_assertion' of http://10.37.145.15:8000/gitlab/vran/release_enb into sp3_rlc_assertion # Conflicts: # openair2/LAYER2/RLC/rlc.c
-
teramoto.genki authored
-
Haruki NAOI authored
-
- Apr 08, 2018
-
-
naoi.haruki authored
Sp3 tdd config1 See merge request !31
-
- Apr 04, 2018
-
-
Wu Jing authored
-
jftt_wangshanshan authored
-
- Apr 03, 2018
-
-
Wu Jing authored
-
- Mar 26, 2018
-
-
Haruki NAOI authored
(cherry picked from commit 0e550a32e46d797d03fd72e54e474762d4db7614) # Conflicts: # openair2/LAYER2/RLC/rlc.c
-
Masayuki HARADA authored
・Delete double BSR calculation. ・change TBS for mcs setting bit to byte. (cherry picked from commit 39cd022424ebe98c95be32cbb4127aa9d0e0ff3b)
-
- Mar 20, 2018
-
-
Haruki NAOI authored
Fix: segmentation fault happens when clean_eNb_dlsch() function is executed while pdsch procedure running.
-
- Mar 16, 2018
-
-
Haruki NAOI authored
-
Cedric Roux authored
As reported by Emad Alizade: According to "Issue255 256 257 paging reesta release" that has been merged in develop version, we have a question: In rrc_eNB_free_UE() function only all ulsch related memory of user has been cleaned, but I think not only ulsch memory but also dlsch memory must be cleaned. I tested the latest develop version and with repetition UE attach-detach procedures we find that the dlsch memory has not been cleaned and after repeat this sequence (45 times) assertion with cause UE_id!=-1 (no free or exiting dlsch_context, dci_tools.c: fill_dci_and_dlsch() ) occurred and no UE will be attached to system. The fixes in this commit are from Emad Alizade. (cherry picked from commit 4b5b5564) # Conflicts: # openair1/PHY/LTE_TRANSPORT/dlsch_coding.c # openair2/LAYER2/MAC/eNB_scheduler.c # openair2/RRC/LITE/rrc_eNB.c
-
- Mar 12, 2018
-
-
jftt_wangshanshan authored
-
jftt_wangshanshan authored
-
- Mar 08, 2018
- Mar 07, 2018
-
-
Wu Jing authored
-
- Mar 06, 2018
-
-
Wu Jing authored
-
- Mar 01, 2018
-
-
naoi authored
-
Wang.shanshan authored
-
naoi authored
-
naoi authored
-
- Feb 28, 2018
- Feb 27, 2018
-
-
Cedric Roux authored
The problem is the following (as reported by an user): "one UE is attached to OAI system. UE is near the antenna. Try to detach the UE and attach again. Repeat this procedure for 5-6 times. OAI system does not work and any the UE can not attach to this system. I use TEMS software and I can see MIB signaling on this UE but UE can not decode SIB1 and SIB2." What happens is that the DCI for SIB1 and SIB2 is not cleared before use. That is the bits in the 'padding' field keep the values that were set before. If the structure has been used to transmit other DCIs (eg. for UEs) in the past, it may be reused with some of those bits set to 1. When receiving this DCI, the UE won't accept it because it gets some bits at 1 where it expects them to be 0. The short-term/quick solution is to clear the 'padding' field. A better solution would be to rewrite this part of the code, which is way too complicated for what it does. But this takes too much time. In dci.h the field 'dummy' of some structures was renamed to 'padding'. The fields 'padding32' and 'padding64' were also renamed to 'padding' for consistency. Some structures (DCI2B_1_5MHz_TDD, DCI2B_10MHz_FDD, DCI2D_1_5MHz_FDD, DCI2D_5MHz_FDD, DCI2D_10MHz_FDD) had a 'padding' field at the end, which was renamed to 'padding0'. I don't know if this field should be here at all. To me this field looks very suspicious. When we test DCIs 2B and 2D we should be careful. (cherry picked from commit c5ca2bd8)
-
jftt_wangshanshan authored
-
- Feb 26, 2018
-
-
Xu Bo authored
-
Wang.shanshan authored
-
jftt_wangshanshan authored
-
- Feb 24, 2018
-
-
jftt_wangshanshan authored
-
Wu Jing authored
-
- Feb 22, 2018
-
-
Masayuki HARADA authored
-
tomita authored
-
tomita authored
-