Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
O
OAI-RAN-5G-sheduler_MaxTBS
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Package Registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Terraform modules
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
MAQ5G-PFC
OAI-RAN-5G-sheduler_MaxTBS
Commits
ee143ac0
Commit
ee143ac0
authored
6 years ago
by
Raphael Defosseux
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
CI: fixing and adding more testcases
Signed-off-by:
Raphael Defosseux
<
raphael.defosseux@eurecom.fr
>
parent
dc9c27a3
No related branches found
Branches containing commit
No related tags found
Tags containing commit
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
ci-scripts/xml_files/enb_usrp210_band7.xml
+26
-2
26 additions, 2 deletions
ci-scripts/xml_files/enb_usrp210_band7.xml
with
26 additions
and
2 deletions
ci-scripts/xml_files/enb_usrp210_band7.xml
+
26
−
2
View file @
ee143ac0
...
...
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
-->
<testCaseList>
<TestCaseRequestedList>
010101 050101 060101 070101 040101 030101 040301 040501 040601 040602 040603 040604 040605 040641 040401 040201 030201 030111 040301 040511 040611 040612 040613 040614 040615 040651 040401 040201 030201 030121 040301 040521 040621 040622 040623 0406
61
040401 040201 030201
</TestCaseRequestedList>
<TestCaseRequestedList>
010101 050101 060101 070101 040101 030101 040301 040501 040601 040602 040603 040604 040605 040641
040642
040401 040201 030201 030111 040301 040511 040611 040612 040613 040614 040615 040651
040652
040401 040201 030201 030121 040301 040521 040621 040622 040623 0406
24 040625 040661 040662
040401 040201 030201
</TestCaseRequestedList>
<TestCaseExclusionList></TestCaseExclusionList>
<testCase
id=
"010101"
>
...
...
@@ -138,6 +138,14 @@
<iperf_packetloss_threshold>
50
</iperf_packetloss_threshold>
</testCase>
<testCase
id=
"040642"
>
<class>
Iperf
</class>
<desc>
iperf (5MHz - UL/9Mbps/UDP)(60 sec)(single-ue profile)
</desc>
<iperf_args>
-u -b 9M -t 60 -i 1 -R
</iperf_args>
<iperf_packetloss_threshold>
50
</iperf_packetloss_threshold>
<iperf_profile>
single-ue
</iperf_profile>
</testCase>
<testCase
id=
"040611"
>
<class>
Iperf
</class>
<desc>
iperf (10MHz - DL/10Mbps/UDP)(60 sec)
</desc>
...
...
@@ -182,6 +190,14 @@
<iperf_packetloss_threshold>
50
</iperf_packetloss_threshold>
</testCase>
<testCase
id=
"040652"
>
<class>
Iperf
</class>
<desc>
iperf (10MHz - UL/20Mbps/UDP)(60 sec)(single-ue profile)
</desc>
<iperf_args>
-u -b 20M -t 60 -i 1 -R
</iperf_args>
<iperf_packetloss_threshold>
50
</iperf_packetloss_threshold>
<iperf_profile>
single-ue
</iperf_profile>
</testCase>
<testCase
id=
"040621"
>
<class>
Iperf
</class>
<desc>
iperf (20MHz - DL/20Mbps/UDP)(60 sec)
</desc>
...
...
@@ -211,7 +227,7 @@
<iperf_profile>
single-ue
</iperf_profile>
</testCase>
<testCase
id=
"04062
4
"
>
<testCase
id=
"04062
5
"
>
<class>
Iperf
</class>
<desc>
iperf (20MHz - DL/70Mbps/UDP)(60 sec)(unbalanced profile)
</desc>
<iperf_args>
-u -b 70M -t 60 -i 1
</iperf_args>
...
...
@@ -226,6 +242,14 @@
<iperf_packetloss_threshold>
50
</iperf_packetloss_threshold>
</testCase>
<testCase
id=
"040662"
>
<class>
Iperf
</class>
<desc>
iperf (20MHz - UL/20Mbps/UDP)(60 sec)(single-ue profile)
</desc>
<iperf_args>
-u -b 20M -t 60 -i 1 -R
</iperf_args>
<iperf_packetloss_threshold>
50
</iperf_packetloss_threshold>
<iperf_profile>
single-ue
</iperf_profile>
</testCase>
<testCase
id=
"050101"
>
<class>
Initialize_HSS
</class>
<desc>
Initialize HSS
</desc>
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment